Saturday, August 16, 2008


Comic Art

Heroes and Artists - Juggernaut

John Byrne

Tommy Lee Edwards

Joe Madurelra

Jack Kirby

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Friday, August 15, 2008


Oh, Give Me A Break

I am sorry, but where I live, California, suffers from enough weirdness all on its own, that we do not need our incredibly eccentric few held up as trends - like the BBC did in this piece.
In America, record prices are fuelling a new Gold Rush - 160 years after thousands descended on California, seeking riches.

With uncertainty in oil and stock markets, gold is seen as a stable investment - it hit a new high of more than $1,000 (£500) an ounce earlier this year and some think there is money to be made once more.

"You can pay your bills, if you live meagrely," says John Gurney, who gave up his job six months ago to become a full-time gold prospector.
A few paragraphs later in this piece which favors romanticism heavily over the truth, you get just a hint of the trouble:
Each 20-minute session usually turns up a few tiny flecks. [emphasis added]
Why would any self-respecting prospector limit himself to 20 minutes of work at a time? Well, he is either working someone else's land/claim and they are regulating him, or more likely he is on BLM land and they are regulating him.

What is kind of sad about all this is that there has been a significant gold rush just across the border in Nevada for the last several decades. There are significant reserves of ore in California that simply can not be accessed because of regulation and plan old NIMBY politics. It is one of the bigger economic tragedies of our time, there are billions of dollars involved.

There are a number of prospector types in California and they are colorful and interesting, and very poor. They have chosen a lifestyle and bully for them if they enjoy it, but a "gold rush" in California? - Not in the near future.

What is really sad about all this is that even in the old days prospectors never did that well. It takes big money to make money in mining - big equipment, big mines, loads of dirt. In most working gold mines today they recover less than an ounce of gold (in some cases a lot less) from one ton of ore. Think about that for a minute. That means for me to make, say $500 a day, I have to shovel and process a ton of ore each day. At guy with a mule and shovel ain't gonna get that done.

The numbers were a little better in the old days, but the prospectors that got rich, got rich because they sold their claims, with royalties, to the big miners. That simply is not happening today because the big miners cannot work in California. Far as I know the only mines working in California today have been in continuous operation since the 1850's are are "grandfathered."

This story is cute, and "prospecting" is a great and beautiful way to make your camping trip more interesting. But "gold rush?" Bah - humbug.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator


Friday Humor


A bus station is where a bus stops.
A train station is where a train stops.
On my desk, I have a work station.....

If Fed Ex and UPS were to merge, would they call it Fed UP?

If quitters never win, and winners never quit, what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"?

Do Lipton employees take coffee breaks?

What hair color do they put on the driver's licenses of bald men?

I was thinking that women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans.

I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me... they were cramming for their finals.

I thought about how mothers feed their babies with little tiny spoons and forks, so I wonder what Chinese mothers use. Toothpicks?

Why do they put pictures of criminals up in the Post Office? What are we supposed to do . . . write to these men? Why don't they just put their pictures on the postage stamps so the mailmen could look for them while they delivered the mail?

How much deeper would oceans be if sponges didn't live there?

If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the OTHERS here for?

Clones are people two.

If a man says something in the woods and there are no women there, is he still wrong?

Go ahead and take risks....just be sure that everything will turn out okay.

If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.

Ever wonder what the speed of lightning would be if it didn't zig-zag?

Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.

If a person with multiple personalities threatens suicide, is that considered a hostage situation?

If a cow laughed, would milk come out its nose?

I went for a walk last night and my kids asked me how long I'd be gone. I said, "The whole time."

So what's the speed of dark?

How come you don't ever hear about "gruntled" employees? And who has been dissing them anyhow?

After eating, do amphibians need to wait an hour before getting OUT of the water?

Why don't they just make mouse-flavored cat food?

If you're sending someone some Styrofoam, what do you pack it in?

I just got skylights put in my place. The people who live above me are furious.

Why do they sterilize needles for lethal injections?

Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?

Isn't Disney World a people trap operated by a mouse?

Whose cruel idea was it for the word "lisp" to have an "s" in it?

Since light travels faster than sound, isn't that why some people appear bright until you hear them speak?

How come abbreviated is such a long word?

If it's zero degrees outside today and it's supposed to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold is it going to be?

Since Americans throw rice at weddings, do Asians throw hamburgers?

Technorati Tags:, ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Thursday, August 14, 2008


What Would You Do?

MMI links to a story out of Minnesota about a Catholic Church that has obtained a TRO against a severely autistic boy.
St. Joseph's, a Catholic church in Bertha, Minnesota, has filed a temporary restraining order against Adam. In a statement, Father Dan Walz said he filed the petition as a last resort out of "...a growing concern for the safety of parishioners..."

Adam is severely autistic, according to his mother. He is home-schooled, and has attended St. Joseph's his whole life.

Adam is more than six feet tall and weighs more than 235 pounds. In court documents, Fr. Walz said Adam's growing size makes it harder for his parents to manage his behavior during mass.


Adam's mother, Carol, said those allegations are either exaggerated or false. She said Adam is not angry or violent. She said he has never spit in church, and that on rare occasions, he has been incontinent.

Carol blames Adam's worst behavior, revving a church member's running car after mass, on a lack of accommodation from the church.

"They don't understand how the mechanisms of autism are working at the moment of these disruptions and so forth," Carol Race said. "And I want to point out that in the last couple of months Adam has been perfectly well-behaved. So that's what's shocking to me."
I am both appalled and sympathetic - emotions I feel towards both sides of this debate, which tells me that we know much less than the full story.

On the surface, if the church moved from problem to TRO without all sorts and months and months of negotiations and concerns and discussions, then the church really should be condemned in the strongest possible terms. But in my experience, whenever these situations hit the press, it is because the family affected goes to them and all the prior intervention is conveniently excluded from the story. But again, we cannot know in this circumstances because there simply is no in-depth reporting whatsoever.

So, If I am going to get exercised here, I am going to aim my derisive tendencies at the press. They seem clearly intent on making the church look bad; something the press is often wont to do.

Which brings to mind some real wisdom. The church should not appeal its business to secular authority save when it is a clearly secular matter. So, for example, on taxation matters the church has little choice. But on matters like this, there really is no reason to reach out to secular authority. I have personally been involved in situations where people were barred from the church - the church had not obtained a TRO but a member thereof had against a non-member. The church was confronted with either relying on the police to enforce the TRO, or its own membership. We simply saw to it that the usher crew for this period were people "in the know" and when the affected individual showed their face, they were very quietly and covertly escorted out. Simultaneously, people were dispatched to the other party to make sure that an inadvertent confrontation did not happen.

Even without a TRO, there is no reason this church could not have acted similarly. They could have assigned this women people to help control her son's behavior. If that failed, they could have enforced the banishment without the need for invoking civil authority.

I am also fairly confident that this women is extremely difficult to deal with - a "problem" personality to say the least. So there is enough mess in all this to smear everyone.

All the more reason to behave like the children of God, not the children of the parent superior court.

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator


Illuminated Scripture

Technorati Tags:
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Wednesday, August 13, 2008


Does The Holy Spirit Make Plans?

Mark Roberts has written series in multiple parts on the role of the Holy Spirit in strategic planning. He has listed several principles for use in such planning:
  1. Acknowledge the sovereignty of God.
  2. Listen for the “bass note” of biblical theology.
  3. Respect the ways God has led in the past.
  4. Recognize that God’s new wine requires new wineskins.
  5. Acknowledge that God uses all we are for his purposes.

This is all very worthy and practical advice, I strongly recommend that if you are in church leadership in any way, you read the series carefully and heed every single word.

Mark is saying in his sage advice something that I would put more simply and directly. In general, strategic planning tends to focus on the institution instead of the Kingdom and the role of the members of the institution in the Kingdom. Most strategic planning I have ever been a part of focused on how to make the church grow instead of how to make the people in the church grow. It focused on how to bring people through the door instead of how to make people that go out and bring people in. It focused on the temporal instead of the eternal.

At the risk of blowing my own horn, I think my business and business in general provides a good example. Most business building today follows a pretty standard model of planning and execution, it is anchored in marketing and sets certain key points where new financial resources are needed, etc. What happens in these circumstances is that the business usually grows exponentially, and then it reaches a certain maturity level and has difficulty transitioning from "new" to "commodity" status. Most businesses fail at this point. Some people, namely the initial investors make an enormous amount of money under this model, and when failure occurs, it is of little consequence to them, their fortune is made.

Of course, 100's, even 1000's of people can be put out of work if the transition fails, and customers that have come to rely on the product are left in a lurch - but the business has done what it set out to do - make money for the investors, at least the early ones. Later investors can find themselves holding the bag.

My business in recent years has become pretty successful - a fact for which I thank the Lord daily. By business standards, it remains small, but I have way more than I need and remain the only investor, and employee. I have built it on a very different model. I focused on the product, not the marketing. I focused on relationships with customers and sub-contractors. I went through many, many lean years.

But my transition point has been a very different one. Rather that transition from "Start-up" to "commodity," I have transitioned from "struggling for the business" to "presumptive vendor." By virtue of the relationships I have built, business now comes to me rather than me having to find it. I do not have to worry much about the next product or sale - they find me easily. My business has a permanence that will become problematic only when I choose to retire and need to figure out a way for my clients to be cared for.

My business plan did not focus on sales, marketing, financing, and investors. My business plan focused on finding customers, providing service, and making friends of them. Now, they send me the new business, and as to all that other stuff, well, it takes care of itself as it is necessary.

What I long for in strategic planning for the church is that later approach. It is slow, results are often hard to see for a long time. But it has permanence, and it focuses on what matters. I long for a strategic plan from a church that says, "Step One - make disciples. Step Two - have those disciples make disciples." Then let the rest of it work itself out as we go along.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Tuesday, August 12, 2008


I am not alone!

You would think that as a scientist of deep faith, I am fairly unique. This MSNBC article opens with the same presumption:
Scientists hate God. Or find God very disturbing. In fact, modern science has found no evidence of God and so it's stupid anymore to think God exists.

The above statements are often presented as conventional wisdom, but are they true?
Thankfully, that is far from truth:
Yet many scientists — 40 percent according to a 1997 poll cited by Shermer — believe in God. This isn't big news to scientists, but might surprise people who rely on mainstream views of science. A handful of those folks — including Jerome Groopman, a professor of medicine at Harvard, and William D. Phillips, Nobel laureate in physics and a fellow of the Joint Quantum Institute of the University of Maryland and the National Institute of Standards and Technology — are also represented in the booklet, arguing that the natural world and the world of faith are relatively separate, yet personally reconcilable domains.
When you get down to the crux of things, this is my favorite bit:
In the booklet, philosopher Mary Midgley, who was not at the AEI event, states that science is just one worldview that has come to prevail. Science and religion need not be at odds.

"What is now seen as a universal cold war between science and religion is, I think, really a more local clash between a particular scientistic worldview, much favored recently in the West, and most other people's worldviews at most other times," she writes.
Notice something implicit in there - science is a "worldview." I think Midgley is right - people that wish to create a culture clash between science and religion certainly treat science as a worldview - but in all my science education it is not a world view - it is, simply a field of study.

I have said this before, and I will say it again, a million times - science limits itself to the naturalistic as a field of study, but that is an arbitrary boundary set to enable a certain set of tools for purposes of making the study. That boundary is NOT the end of reality, it is simply a dividing line - inside science works, outside of it, it does not.

There is a very old joke that you may or may not get. A farmer's hens quit laying, so he calls the smartest guy he knows to help solve the problem - a theoretical physicist. The physicist moves into the chicken coop for the better part of a week. He eventually emerges covered in chicken mess and straw. He stumbles up to the farmer and says, "I have solved your problem, but only if you have a perfectly spherical chicken in a vacuuum."

Think about that joke for a minute - to solve the problem the physicist set limiting conditions. What makes the joke extraordinarily funny to we science geek types is that is something we do every day - we set up the problem in such a way that we can solve it, even if what we set up is only vaguely related to the reality that evoked the question to begin with.

Many science types claim to have solved the "mysteries of the universe." Far from it, they have solved some extraordinary mysteries, but they are mysteries that they are interested in framed in a way that permits them to solve them.

What we have on our hands here is good old human emotion and socio/religio/political conflict. It is a power struggle for the hearts and minds of the world. Like all great conflicts you try and chose the place of battle. Since this is a battle over explaining reality, scientists chose to proclaim the natural as reality.

They're just wrong about that.

But then the church has hardly played fair in all this over the centuries either. So on a purely human level, I don't blame the scientists too much. Although, for people that claim reason as their final authority, it is disappointing to see them be somewhat deceitful in their presentation. (Although for moralists, I could say the same about the church.)

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator


Kitty Kartoons

Related Tags: , , ,

Monday, August 11, 2008


How To Argue

John Mark Reynolds recently looked at how Christians argue through the lens of Plato's Republic.
Winning an argument is easy, winning a soul is hard. Too often Internet dialog seems content to “hit and run,” but transforming and really persuading a person is harder. That requires being open to the possibility of being wrong and to staying around for discussion. Plato’s Republic teaches this lesson.


Christians are apt to be content with “winning arguments.” Too often we prize debates between theists and atheists not for the truth that might emerge from them, but because we want to see the home team score a knock out punch. We persuade ourselves, but none of the onlookers. These people may be sympathetic with our position, but they want to be truly persuaded and not just bludgeoned into agreement. Socrates is willing to go forward, because the souls of the eager young men are at stake. In the same way, in coffee shops and in classrooms, I hope Christian educators (some of whom get paid for the work!) are willing to engage in open ended long term discussion with any one willing to follow the argument (the divine Logos!) where it leads.
I am pleased to see my friend JMR take Christian educators to task, but I think he reveals a lesson for all Christians, everywhere.

When we reduce the Christian faith to some set of doctrines or beliefs to be defended purely intellectually we miss the point entirely. Jesus Christ was not crucified so I can believe and defend He was resurrected - He was crucified, and resurrected to cover my sins. This is no mere intellectual exercise, this is visceral stuff. Consider this passage from The Voyage of The Dawn Treader:
"Well, anyway, I looked up and saw the very last thing I expected: a huge lion coming slowly toward me. And one queer thing was that there was no moon last night, but there was moonlight where the lion was. So it came nearer and nearer. I was terribly afraid of it. You may think that, being a dragon, I could have knocked any lion out easily enough. But it wasn't that kind of fear. I wasn't afraid of it eating me, I was just afraid of if-if you can understand. Well, it came close up to me and looked straight into my eyes. And I shut my eyes tight. But that wasn't any good because it told me to follow it."

"You mean it spoke?"

"I don't know. Now that you mention it, I don't think it did. But it told me all the same. And I knew I'd have to do what it told me, so I got up and followed it. And it led me a long way into the mountains. And there was always this moonlight over and round the lion wherever we went. So at last we came to the top of a mountain I'd never seen before and on the top of this mountain there was a garden-trees and fruit and everything. In the middle of it there was a well.

"I knew it was a well because you could see the water bubbling up from the bottom of it: but it was a lot bigger than most wells-like a very big, round bath with marble steps going down into it. The water was as clear as anything and I thought if I could get in there and bathe it would ease the pain in my leg. But the lion told me I must undress first. Mind you, I don't know if he said any words out loud or not.

"I was just going to say that I couldn't undress because I hadn't any clothes on when I suddenly thought that dragons are snaky sort of things and snakes can cast their skins. Oh, of course, thought I, that's what the lion means. So I started scratching myself and my scales began coming off all over the place. And then I scratched a little deeper and, instead of just scales coming off here and there, my whole skin started peeling off beautifully, like it does after an illness, or as if I was a banana. In a minute or two I just stepped out of it. I could see it lying there beside me, looking rather nasty. It was a most lovely feeling. So I started to go down into the well for my bathe.

"But just as I was going to put my feet into the water I looked down and saw that they were all hard and rough and wrinkled and scaly just as they had been before. Oh, that's all right, said I, it only means I had another smaller suit on underneath the first one, and I'll have to get out of it too. So I scratched and tore again and this under-skin peeled off beautifully and out I stepped and left it lying beside the other one and went down to the well for my bathe.

"Well, exactly the same thing happened again. And I thought to myself, oh dear, how ever many skins have I got to take off? For I was longing to bathe my leg. So I scratched away for the third time and got off a third skin, just like the two others, and stepped out of it. But as soon as I looked at myself in the water I knew it had been no good.

"Then the lion said-but I don't know if it spoke, "You will have to let me undress you.' I was afraid of his claws, I can tell you, but I was pretty nearly desperate now. So I just lay flat down on my back to let him do it.

"The very first tear he made was so deep that I thought it had gone right into my heart. And when he began pulling the skin off it hurt worse than anything I've ever felt. The only thing that made me able to bear it was just the pleasure of feeling the stuff peel off. You know-if you've ever picked the scab of a sore place. It hurts like billy-oh but it was such fun to see it coming away.

"I know exactly what you mean," said Edmund.

"Well, he peeled the beastly stuff right off-just as I thought I'd done it myself the other three times, only they hadn't hurt-and there it was lying on the grass: only ever so much thicker, and darker, and more knobbly looking than the others had been. And there was I as smooth and soft as a peeled switch and smaller than I had been. Then he caught hold of me, I didn't like that much for I was very tender underneath now that I'd no skin on-and threw me into the water. It smarted like anything but only for a moment. After that it became perfectly delicious and as soon as I started swimming and splashing I found that all the pain had gone from my arm. And then I saw why. I'd turned into a boy again. You'd think me simply phony if I told you how I felt about my own arms. I know they've no muscle and are pretty mouldy compared with Caspian's, but I was so glad to see them.

"After a bit the lion took me out and dressed...

"Dressed you. With his paws?"

"Well, I don't exactly remember that bit. But he did somehow or other: in new clothes-the same I've got on now, as a matter of fact. And then suddenly I was back here. Which is what makes me think it must have been a dream."

"No. It wasn't a dream," said Edmund.

"Why not?"

"Well, there are the clothes, for one thing. And you have been-well, un-dragoned, for another."

"What do you think it was, then?" asked Eustace.

"I think you've seen Aslan," said Edmund.
From the very beginning Eustace believed that Aslan could undragon him, and Eustace did his best to be undragoned. Given time, I am sure Eustace could have invented all sorts of great defenses for the intellectual proposition that Aslan was the key to being undragoned and that He was in the process of undragoning him.

But it was not until Eustace let Aslan RIP HIM OPEN - levels much, much deeper than mere intellectual ascent - that the undragoning actually occurred.

When I am confronted with unbelief, the essential question is not how to change the unbelief, but how to change the unbeliever. Note that Eustace was undragoned, but clueless that he had in fact met Aslan.

Could God use you for an instrument in such a situation? Are you sufficiently transformed to let God use you for transformation when the one being transformed does not even know the name of the transformer?

That is what we are called to. Our faith is not essentially intellectual, it is all- consuming.

Be consumed.

Technorati Tags:, ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Sunday, August 10, 2008


Sermons and Lessons


John Howe, a leading writer and divine under the Commonwealth, was born in 1630, at Loughborough, in Leicestershire, England. He was educated at Cambridge and Oxford, and ‘ordained by Charles Herle, rector of Winwick, whom he styled, “a primitive bishop.” He became chaplain to Cromwell and his son Richard. Among his contributions to Puritan theology are “The Good Man the Living Temple of God,” and “Vanity of Men as Mortal.” He was a man of intellect and imagination. His sermons, though often long and cumbersome, are marked by warmth of fancy and a sublimity of spirit superior to his style. Howe was a leading spirit in the effort made for the union of the Congregational and Presbyterian bodies. He died in 1705.

The Redeemer’s Tears Over Lost Souls

And when He was come near, He beheld the city, and wept over it, saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong to thy peace! But now they are hid from thine eyes. - Luke 19: 41, 42.

Such as live under the gospel have a day, or a present opportunity, for the obtaining the knowledge of those things immediately belonging to their peace, and of whatsoever is besides necessary thereunto. I say nothing what opportunities they have who never lived under the gospel, who yet no doubt might generally know more than they do, and know better what they do know. It suffices who enjoy the gospel to understand our own advantages thereby. Nor, as to those who do enjoy it, is every one’s day of equal clearness. How few, in comparison, have ever seen such a day as Jerusalem at this time did! made by the immediate beams of the Sun of Righteousness! our Lord Himself vouchsafing to be their Instructor, so speaking as never man did, and with such authority as far outdid their other teachers, and astonished the hearers. In what transports did He use to leave those that heard Him, wheresoever He came, wondering at the gracious words that came out of His mouth! And with what mighty and beneficial works was He wont to recommend His doctrine, shining in the glorious power and savoring of the abundant mercy of Heaven, so that every apprehensive mind might see the Deity was incarnate. God was come down to entreat with men, and allure them into the knowledge and love of himself. The Word was made flesh. What unprejudiced mind might not perceive it to be so? He was there manifested and veiled at once; both expressions are made concerning the same matter. The divine beams were somewhat obscured, but did yet ray through that veil; so that His glory was beheld of the only-begotten Son of His Father, full of grace and truth.

This Sun shone with a mild and benign, but with a powerful, vivifying light. In Him was life, and that life was the light of men. Such a light created unto the Jews this their day. Happy Jews, if they had understood their own happiness! And the days that followed to them (for a while) and the Gentile world were not inferior, in some respects brighter and more glorious (the more copious gift of the Holy Ghost being reserved unto the crowning and enthroning of the victorious Redeemer), when the everlasting gospel flew like lightning to the uttermost ends of the earth, and the word which began to be spoken by the Lord Himself was confirmed by them that heard Him, God also Himself bearing them witness with signs, and wonders, and gifts of the Holy Ghost. No such day hath been seen this many an age. Yet whithersoever this same gospel, for substance, comes, it also makes a day of the same kind, and affords always true though diminished light, whereby, however, the things of our peace might be understood and known. The written gospel varies not, and if it be but simply and plainly proposed (though to some it be proposed with more advantage, to some with less, still we have the same things immediately relating to our peace extant before our eyes.

This day bath its bounds and limits, so that when it is over and lost with such, the things of their peace are forever hid from their eyes. And that this day is not infinite and endless, we see in the present instance. Jerusalem had her day; but that day had its period, we sec it comes to this at last, that now the things of her peace are hid from her eyes. We generally see the same thing, in that sinners are so earnestly prest to make use of the present time. Today if you will hear His voice, harden not your hearts. They are admonished to seek the Lord while He may be found, to call upon Him when He is nigh. It seems some time He will not be found, and will be far off. They are told this is the accepted time, this is the day of salvation. As it is certain death ends the day of grace with every unconverted person, so. it is very possible that it may end with divers before they die; by their total loss of all external means, or by the departure of the blest Spirit of God from them; so as to return and visit them no more.

How the day of grace may end with a person, is to be understood by considering what it is that makes up and constitutes such a day. There must become measure and proportion of time to make up this (or any) day, which is as the substratum and ground fore-laid. Then there must be light superadded, otherwise it differs not from night, which may have the same measure of mere time. The gospel revelation some way or other, must be had, as being the light of such a day. And again there must be some degree of liveliness, and vital influence, the more usual concomitant of light; the night doth more dispose men to drowsiness. The same sun that enlightens the world disseminates also an invigorating influence. If the Spirit of the living God do no way animate the gospel revelation, and breathe in it, we have no day of grace. It is not only a day of light, but a day of power, wherein souls can be wrought upon, and a people made willing to become the Lord’s. As the Redeemer revealed in the gospel, is the light of the world, so He is life to it too, tho neither are planted or do take root everywhere. In Him was life and that life was the light of men. That light that rays from Him is vital light in itself, and in its tendency and design, though it be disliked and not entertained by the most. Whereas therefore these things must concur to make up such a day; if either a man’s time, his life on earth, expire, or if light quite fail him, or if all gracious influence be withheld, so as to be communicated no more, his day is done, the season of grace is over with him. Now it is plain that many a one may lose the gospel before his life end: and possible that all gracious influence may be restrained, while as yet the external dispensation of the gospel remains. A sinner may have hardened his heart to that degree that God will attempt him no more, in any kind, with any design of kindness to him, not in that more inward, immediate way at all - i.e., by the motions of His Spirit, which peculiarly can impart nothing but friendly inclination, as whereby men are personally applied unto, so that can not be meant; nor by the voice of the gospel, which may either be continued for the sake of others, or they contained under it, but for their heavier doom at length. Which, though it may seem severe, is not to be thought strange, much less unrighteous.

It is not to be thought strange to them that read the Bible, which so often speaks this sense; as when it warns and threatens men with so much terror. For if we sin willfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a fearful looking for judgment, and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. He that despised Moses ‘s law died without mercy, under two or three witnesses; of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith He was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? And when it tells us, after many overtures made to men in vain, of His having given them up. “But my people would not hearken to my voice; and Israel would none of me; so I gave them up unto their own hearts’ lust: and they walked in their own counsels;” and pronounces, “Let him that is unjust be unjust still, and let him which is filthy be filthy still,” and says, “In thy filthiness is lewdness, because I have purged thee, and thou wast not purged; thou shalt not be purged from thy filthiness any more, till I have caused my fury to rest upon thee.” Which passages seem to imply a total desertion of them, and retraction of all gracious influence. And when it speaks of letting them be under the gospel, and the ordinary means of salvation, for the most direful purpose: as that, “This child (Jesus) was set for the fall, as well as for the rising, of many in Israel”; as that, “Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling, and a rock of offense”; end, “The stone which the builders refused, is made a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient, whereunto also they were appointed”; with that of our Savior Himself, “For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see, might be made blind.” And most agreeable to those former places is that of the prophet, “But the word of the Lord was unto them precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.” And we may add, that our God bath put us out of doubt that there is such a sin as that which is eminently called the sin against the Holy Ghost; that a man in such circumstances, and to such a degree, sin against that Spirit, that He will never move or breathe upon him more, but leave him to a hopeless ruin; tho I shall not in this discourse determine or discuss the nature of it. But I doubt not it is somewhat else than final impenitency and infidelity; and that every one that dies, not having sincerely repented and believed, is not guilty of it, tho every one that is guilty of it dies impenitent and unbelieving, but was guilty of it before; so it is not the mere want of time that makes him guilty. Whereupon, therefore, that such may outlive their day of grace, is out of the question.

Wherefore, no man can certainly know, or ought to conclude, concerning himself or others, as long as they live, that the season of grace is quite over with them. As we can conceive no rule God hath set to Himself to proceed by, in ordinary cases of this nature; so nor is there any He hath set unto us to judge by, in this case. It were to no purpose, and could be of no use to men to know so much; therefore it were unreasonable to expect God should have settled and declared any rule, by which they might come to the knowledge of it. As the case is then, viz.: there being no such rule, no such thing can be concluded; for who can tell what an arbitrary, sovereign, free agent will do, if he declare not his own purpose himself? How should it be known, when the Spirit of God hath been often working upon the soul of man, that this or that shall be the last act, and that he will never put forth another? And why should God make it known? To the person himself whose case it is, ‘tis manifest it could be of no benefit. Nor is it to be thought the Holy God will ever so alter the course of His own proceedings but that it shall be finally seen to all the world that every man’s destruction was entirely, and to the last, of himself. If God had made it evident to a man that he were finally rejected, lie were obliged to believe it. But shall it ever be said, God bath made anything a man’s duty which were inconsistent with his felicity. The having sinned himself into such a condition wherein he is forsaken of God is indeed inconsistent with it. And so the case is to stand – i.e., that his perdition be in immediate connection with his sin, not with his duty; as it would be in immediate, necessary connection with his duty, if he were hound to believe himself finally forsaken and a lost creature. For that belief makes him hopeless, and a very devil, justifies his unbelief in the gospel, toward himself, by removing and shutting up, toward himself, the object of such a faith, and consequently brings the matter to this state that he perishes, not because lie doth not believe God reconcilable to man, but because, with particular application to himself, he ought not so to believe. And it were most unfit, and of very pernicious consequence, that such a thing should be generally known concerning others. .

But though none ought to conclude that their day or season of grace is quite expired, yet they ought to deeply apprehend the danger, lest it should expire before their necessary work be done and their peac” made. For tho it can be of no use for them to know the former, and therefore they have no means appointed them by which to know it, ‘tis of great use to apprehend the latter; and they have sufficient ground for the apprehension. All the cautions and warnings wherewith the Holy Spirit abounds, of the kind with those already mentioned, have that manifest design. And nothing can be snore important, or opposite to this purpose, than that solemn charge of the great apostle: “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling”; considered together with the subjoined ground of it; “For it is God that worketh in you to will and to do of his own good pleasure.” How correspondent is the one with the other; work for He works: there were no working at all to any purpose, or with any hope, if He did not work. And work with fear and trembling, for He works of his own good pleasure, q. d., “ ‘Twere the greatest folly imaginable to trifle with One that works at so perfect liberty, under no obligation, that may desist when He will; to impose upon so absolutely sovereign and arbitrary an Agent, that owes you nothing; and from whose former gracious operations not complied with you can draw no argument, unto any following ones, that because He doth, therefore He will. As there is no certain connection between present time and future, but all time is made up of undepending, not strictly coherent, moments, so as no man can be sure, because one now exists, another shall; there is also no more certain connection between the arbitrary acts of a free agent within such time; so that I can not be sure, because He now darts in light upon me, is now convincing me, now awakening me, therefore He will still do so, again and again.” Upon this ground then, what exhortation could be more proper than this? “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling.” What could be more awfully monitory and enforcing of it than that He works only of mere good will and pleasure? How should I tremble to think, if I should be negligent, or undutiful, He may give out the next moment, may let the work fall, and me perish? And there is more especial cause for such an apprehension upon the concurrence of such things as these:

1. If the workings of God’s Spirit upon the soul of a man have been more than ordinarily strong and urgent, and do not now cease: if there have been more powerful convictions, deeper humiliations, more awakened fears, more formed purposes of a new life, more fervent desires that are now vanished, and the sinner returns to his dead and dull temper.

2. If there be no disposition to reflect and consider the difference, no sense of his loss, but he apprehends such workings of spirit in him unnecessary troubles to him, and thinks it well he is delivered and eased of them.

3. If in the time when he was under such workings of the Spirit he had made known his case to his minister, or any godly friend, whose company he now shuns, as not willing to be put in mind, or hear any more of such matters.

4. If, hereupon he hath more indulged sensual inclination, taken more liberty, gone against the check of his own conscience, broken former good resolutions, involved himself in the guilt of any grosser sins.

5. If conscience, so baffled, be now silent, lets him alone, grows more sluggish and weaker, which it must as his lusts grow stronger.

6. If the same lively, powerful ministry which before affected him much, now moves him not.

7. If especially he is grown into a dislike of such preaching - if serious godliness, and what tends to it, are become distasteful to him - if discourses of God, and of Christ, of death and judgment, and of a holy life, are reckoned superfluous and needless, are unsavory and disrelished - if he have learned to put disgraceful names upon things of this import, and the persons that most value them live accordingly - if he hath taken the seat of the scorner, and makes it his business to deride what he had once a reverence for, or took some complacency in.

8. If, upon all this, God withdraw such a ministry, so that he is now warned, admonished, exhorted and striven with, as formerly, no more. Oh, the fearful danger of that man’s ease! Hath he no cause to fear lest the things of his peace should be forever hid from his eyes? Surely he hath much cause of fear, but not of despair. Fear in this case would be his great duty, and might yet prove the means of saving him - despair would be his very heinous and destroying sin. If yet he would be stirred up to consider his case, whence he is fallen, and whither he is falling, and set himself to serious seekings of God, cast down himself before Him, abase himself, cry for mercy as for his life, there is yet hope in his case. God may make here an instance what He can obtain of Himself to do for a perishing wretch. But if with any that have lived under the gospel, their day is quite expired, and the things of their peace now forever hid from their eyes, this is in itself a most deplorable case, and much lamented by our Lord Jesus Him¬self. That the case is in itself most deplorable, who sees not? A soul lost! a creature capable of God ! upon its way to Him! near to the kingdom of God! shipwrecked in the port! Oh, sinner, from how high a hope art thou fallen! into what depths of misery and wo! And that it was lamented by our Lord is in the text. He beheld the city (very generally, we have reason to apprehend, inhabited by such wretched creatures) and wept over it. This was a very affectionate lamentation. We lament often, very heartily, many a sad case for which we do not shed tears. But tears, such tears, falling from such eyes! the issues of the purest and best-governed passion that ever was, showed the true greatness of the cause. Here could be no exorbitancy or unjust excess, nothing more than was proportional to the occasion. There needs no other proof that this is a sad case than that our Lord lamented it with tears, which that He did we are plainly told, so that, touching that, there is no place for doubt. All that is liable to question is, whether we are to conceive in Him any like resentments of such cases, in His present glorified state? Indeed, we can not think heaven a place or state of sadness or lamentation, and must take heed of conceiving anything there, especially on the throne of glory, unsuitable to the most perfect nature, and the most glorious state. We are not to imagine tears there, which, in that happy region are wiped away from inferior eyes - no grief, sorrow, or sighing, which are all fled away, and shall be no more, as there can be no other turbid passion of any kind. But when expressions that import anger or grief are used, even concerning God Himself, we must sever in our conception everything of imperfection, and ascribe everything of real perfection. We are not to think such expressions signify nothing that they have no meaning, or that nothing at all is to be attributed to Him under them. Nor are we again to think they signify the same thing with what we find in ourselves, and are wont to express by those names. In the divine nature there may be real, and yet most serene, complacency and displacency - viz., that, unaccompanied by the least commotion, that impart nothing of imperfection, but perfection rather, as it is a perfection to apprehend things suitably to what in themselves they are. The holy Scriptures frequently speak of God as angry, and grieved for the sins of men, and their miseries which ensue therefrom. And a real aversion and dislike is signified thereby, and by many other expressions, which in us would signify vehement agitations of affection, that we are sure can have no place in Him. We ought, therefore, in our own thoughts to ascribe to Him that calm aversion of will, in reference to the sins and miseries of men in general; and in our own apprehensions to remove to the utmost distance from Him all such agitations of passion or affection, even though some expressions that occur carry a great appearance thereof, should they be understood according to human measures, as they are human forms of speech. As, to instance in what is said by the glorious God Himself, and very near in sense to what we have in the text, what can be more pathetic than that lamenting wish, “Oh, that my people had hearkened unto me, and Israel had walked in my ways!” But we must take heed lest, under the pretense that we can not ascribe everything to God that such expressions seem to import, we therefore ascribe nothing. We ascribe nothing, if we do not ascribe a real unwillingness that men should sin on, and perish, and consequently a real willingness that they should turn to Him, and live, which so many plain texts assert. And therefore it is unavoidably imposed upon us to believe that God is truly unwilling of some things which He doth not think fit to interpose His omnipotency to hinder, and is truly willing of some things which He doth not put forth His omnipoteney to effect.

We can not, therefore, doubt but that,

1. He distinctly comprehends the truth of any such case. He beholds, from the throne of His glory above, all the treaties which are held and managed with sinners in His name, and what their deportments are therein. His eyes are as a flame of fire, wherewith He searcheth hearts and trieth reins. He bath seen therefore, sinner, all along every time an offer of grace hath been made to thee, and been rejected; when thou hast slighted counsels and warnings that have been given thee, exhortations and treaties that have been prest upon thee for many years together, and how thou hast hardened thy heart against reproofs and threatcnings, against promises and allurements, and beholds the tendency of all this, what is like to come to it, and that, if thou persist, it will be bitterness in the end.

2. That He hath a real dislike of the sinfulness of thy course. It is not indifferent to Him whether thou obeyest or disobeyest the gospel, whether thou turn and repent or no; that lie is truly displeased at thy trifling, sloth, negligence, impenitency, hardness of heart, stubborn obstinacy, and contempt of His grace, and takes real offense at them.

3. He hath real kind propensions toward thee, and is ready to receive thy returning soul, and effectually to mediate with the of¬fended majesty of heaven for thee, as long as there is any hope in thy case.

4. When He sees there is no hope, He pities thee, while thou seest it not, and dost not pity thyself. Pity and mercy above arc not names only; ‘tis a great reality that is signified by them, and that hath place here in far higher excellency and perfection than it can with us poor mortals here below. Ours is but borrowed and participated from that first fountain and original above. Thou dost not perish unlamented even with the purest heavenly pity, though thou hast made thy case incapable of remedy; as the well tempered judge bewails the sad end of the malefactor, whom justice obliges him not to spare or save.

And that thou mayst not throw away thy soul and so great a hope, through mere sloth and loathness to be at some pains for thy life, let the text, which hath been thy directory about the things that belong to thy peace, be also thy motive, as it gives thee to behold the Son of God weeping over such as would not know those things. Shall not the Redeemer’s tears move thee? 0 hard heart! Consider what these tears import to this purpose.

1. They signify the real depth and greatness of the misery into which thou are falling. They drop from an intellectual and most comprehensive eye, that sees far and pierces deep into things, hath a wide and large prospect; takes the comfort of that forlorn state into which unreconcilable sinners are hasten¬ing, in all the horror of it. The Son of God did not weep vain and causeless tears, or for a light matter; nor did He for Himself either spend His own or desire the profusion of others’ tears. “Weep not for me, 0 daughters of Jerusalem,” etc. He knows the value of souls, the weight of guilt, and how low it will press and sink them; the severity of God’s justice and the power of His anger, and what the fearful effects of them will be when they finally fall. If thou understandest not these things thyself, believe Him that did; at least believe His tears.

2. They signify the sincerity of His love and pity, the truth and tenderness of His compassion. Canst thou think His deceitful tears? His, who never knew guile? Was this like the rest of his course? And remember that He who shed tears did, from the same fountain of love and mercy, shed blood too! Was that also done to deceive? Thou makest thyself a very considerable thing indeed, if thou thinkest the Son of God counted it worth His while to weep, and bleed, and die, to deceive thee into a false esteem of Him and His love. But if it be the greatest madness imaginable to entertain any such thought but that His tears were sincere and unartificial, the natural, genuine expression of undissembled benignity and pity, thou art then to consider what love and compassion thou art now sinning against; what bowels thou spurnest; and that if thou perishest, ‘tis under such guilt as the devils themselves are not liable to, who never had a Redeemer bleeding for them, nor, that we ever find, weeping over them.

3. They show the remedilessness of thy ease if thou persist in impenitency and un¬belief till the things of thy peace be quite hid from thine eyes. These tears will then be the last issues of (even defeated) love, of love that is frustrated of its kind design. Thou mayst perceive in these tears the steady, un¬alterable laws of heaven, the inflexibleness of the divine justice, that holds thee in adamantine bonds, and bath sealed thee up, if thou prove incurably obstinate and impenitent, unto perdition; so that even the Redeemer Himself, He that is mighty to save, can not at length save thee, but only weep over thee, drop tears into thy flame, which assuage it not; but (though they have another design, even to express true compassion) do yet unavoidably heighten and increase the fervor of it, and will do so to all eternity. He even tells thee, sinner, “Thou hast despised My blood; thou shalt yet have My tears.” That would have saved thee, these do only lament thee lost. But the tears wept over others, as lost and past hope, why should they not yet melt thee, while as yet there is hope in thy case? If thou be effectually melted in thy very soul, and looking to Him whom thou hast pierced, dost truly mourn over Him, thou mayst assure thyself the prospect His weeping eye had of lost souls did not include thee. His weeping over thee would argue thy case forlorn and hopeless; thy mourning over Him will make it safe and happy. That it may be so, consider, further, that,

4. They signify how very intent He is to save souls, and how gladly He would save thine, if yet thou wilt accept of mercy while it may be had. For if He weep over them that will not be saved, from the same love that is the spring of these tears, would saving mercies proceed to those that are become willing to receive them. And that love that wept over them that were lost, how will it glory in them that are saved! There His love is disappointed and vexed, crossed in its gracious intendment; but here, having com¬passed it, how will He joy over thee with singing, and rest in His love! And thou also, instead of being revolved in a like ruin with the unreconciled sinners of old Jerusalem, shalt be enrolled among the glorious citizens of the new, and triumph together with them in glory.

Technorati Tags:, ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Site Feed


eXTReMe Tracker

Blogarama - The Blog Directory